Jump to content

DaPainWayne

Member
  • Posts

    698
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    18
  • SteamID

    76561198079225908

Posts posted by DaPainWayne

  1. This report was brought to me by a GM who was part of the host for the event. The event was a zombie vs survivors type event, where once you die you become a zombie. The report was that during the event, before you became a zombie, you aimed and began shooting a bunch of other survivors. The GM took notice of it, and jailtp'ed you to talk to you and clear things up, but after you were teleported you disconnected from the server. After the event, the GM approached me with the report, and I confirmed it in logs that you did in fact, prior to changing to the zombie team, dealt a lot of damage to friendlies. It is because of this that you were given a ban, for the MRDM of killing/attempting to kill other players, the FailRP for the act against a friendly team, and the LTAP part due to leaving once a GM tried to explain things to you, I took that as "Oh, I have been caught, let me leave". 

     

    There was a portion of the start of the event to where survivors were told they can kill other survivor teams, which is why when it happened during the event, I didn't pay much attention to it. It wasn't until after the event, when the GM talked to me about it, that it was brought up that you weren't supposed to be doing it, and that your actions were outside of what was supposed to be happening. The GM is who made it clear to me that the actions were not part of the event "script", and that it was in fact MRDM. 

     

    I am sorry, but I don't believe this is a ban that should be reversed, due to the fact that you had killed several players while damaging several more. It was especially bad that when the GM tried to talk to you about it that you left the server without allowing them to talk to you, this is the part that really puts you in the wrong. You should never leave when a staff member teleports you to explain things to you.

  2. I would like to start off by apologizing for not sending you a message informing you of the ban. After consideration, it was wrong on my part. This situation was reported to me moments after you had disconnected this afternoon, and you were offline when I pushed the ban through. You are correct, that you should have been informed.

     

    Continuing, part of your explanation is not lining up with the stories I've either heard, were reported, or witnessed myself. I would like to begin with today's occurrence, since ultimately this is what prompted the ban. It was reported to me that, as you've said, you walked up to a SHOCK trooper and another player (specifics were not provided to me, however you say it was an ARC Heavy), and made a comment asking them if they are dating. As reported to me, you then proceeded to pull out your grenade, which was PAC edited to an enlarged eggplant, and asked the players "Do you guys think this is relatable?" Again, this is what was reported to me. The players then walked away from you, avoiding any continuation of the conversation. The player told me that they felt weird about the comment, hence them walking away. They originally reported it to me as ERP with PAC abuse, which personally I didn't fully agree with the ERP standpoint being that there was no attempted action on your part. The players state they wanted nothing to do with the conversation, contributed nothing to provoke it, and that you had made the comments regarding the PAC, which contradicts your claim.

     

    As for the events yesterday, I want to start off by saying I should have dealt with it then, but was dealing with some things IRL and was not in the right mindset to deal with it then, and I failed to ask any other admins to do so. As you have stated, it was between you and Browning in OOC chat. The context, same as you, I forget the specifics of, and it is proving to be quite difficult to find it in our logs. However, what transpired in OOC did not appear to be a friendly conversation. From my point of view, it seemed more like an argument, that you originated, and seemed to want to get a rise out of Browning. You were asked to stop multiple times by both myself and another admin online (you state it was Trail, just personally I don't remember). After our first requests that you stop, you did continue on, prompting us to ask again, to which I believe you stopped then. With the continuation, I don't believe Browning continued after our first request, to my knowledge you continued yourself in OOC until our second requests. Then, as I was spectating a player who was nearby you, Browning was walking past you that I saw, and you made another comment in voice chat pertaining to the topic in OOC and laughed at Browning, before walking away. I believe there was a briefing called, which everyone was making their way to. The issue I had here, is that you were asked multiple times to drop the issue, yet you seemed to disregard our requests and wanted to continue the argument. Now again, this issue was yesterday, and I should have dealt with it then, and it is my mistake that I did not. (If you have the screenshots of your conversation in discord, please send them to me, as this does bear relevance to my standpoint)

     

    The reason why yesterday's occurrence tied into the ban today, is because you have shown a trend of arrogance towards others in the past. You have no formal punishments for this behavior, correct. However, that doesn't mean you don't act this way. There were a few admins I talked to today (I will not provide names) who also agreed that you have had borderline interactions with the player base prior to this, however either nothing was enough to act on, or it slipped through the cracks. You are correct that you have a clean record, but that doesn't mean a clean act. In my opinion, these instances show a trend that constitute harassment. My hope from this ban, is that you realize part of your behavior should change to avoid these circumstances. Harassment isn't always a one time thing, with one player. Harassment, in my opinion, is also something observed over a longer period of time that can pertain to either a singular person or group of people. 

     

    I would also like to point out that the server guidelines do not call for a warn prior to a ban for harassment. The guidelines outline it as a Warn AND a Week Ban, as we use the warn to track infractions while in game rather than having to look online. I did not talk to you prior to the ban because, as stated before, you had just gone offline when today's incident was reported to me. 

  3. I don't think limiting when someone can join is a good way to go about things. It's like planning a friend meet up after college, no two schedules line up the same..... ever. Permban appeals are given a HIGH amount of consideration prior to reversing it. I don't think anything beyond that is necessary. If a player were to fumble again, break a rule, or whatever it is, they would (if I'm not mistaken) just be permbanned again and most likely never be unbanned again. 

     

    Granted, it's a neat idea. Probably would be an idea best spent on like a Serious-RP server, where that title could reflect like a job, and could have actual in game applications if applied correctly. 

  4. I'm not sure why you quoted my post, and then edited my quote. However, whether or not you were saying the statements to a friend or to a stranger, it still is content we do not allow on our server. I never said you were harassing people, just simply that we had multiple reports about you saying explicit content. 

     

    The arrests portion of my reply was simply to add context that you were being observed by Admins for more than one reason, and technically wasn't a contributing factor to the ban. You were banned solely for the ERP content. However, I could have banned for the FailRP of being arrested repeatedly. It was my choice of which to go off of, and I just chose the ERP. If anything, the ban reason can be changed to be for FailRP, if seniors decide the content was not ERP. 

  5. The statement you made, which thank you for quoting it above, falls in my opinion under our Erotic Roleplay (ERP) rules. Please remember, we have children who play this server, and I don't believe your statement is anywhere near appropriate for the environment. You have made borderline statements for the last few hours, where we got a few reports of some malicious comments you made. You also managed to get arrested a decent number of times, which that itself can fall under FailRP punishment.

     

    Mainly, you made a number of slight breaks in the rules, that weren't enough to punish solely on. However, your final comment was the last straw for me.

     

    I do not believe this is a ban that should be decreased in time, nor appealed completely. It is ultimately up the higher ups the outcome, however I do not recommend any changes be made to this ban.

  6. As long as the spider stays in whatever corner they're in, I don't bother them. But, if the spider starts to journey through my house, then I see it as an invasion and I must stop it. It's a very fair deal. For the most part, if I just don't know of their existence, I have no issue. But if I see a the bitch walking across my living room, it must die.

     

    (Also Joshy, you looking at the spider that way makes me nervous)

  7. Hello. I was the Admin that gave you the ban. To clarify, the ban was for Mass RDM. So, essentially what I observed was you shot one player in the Debrief room, and then killed a player. After this point, I began spectating you. I will admit, while I was spectating, there was a change in character (different movements, behavior seemed different). After leaving and rejoining, you had killed another player, and at this point I jailtp'ed you. The jailtp was an immediate thing, and after tp'ing, you were talking in voice, which leads me to believe that it was not your brother. 

     

    If your story holds true, then I would only be led to believe of the 1 kill, which wouldn't prompt the given punishment. I don't believe that you should be unbanned completely, but I would feel comfortable with a shortened ban, to maybe 3 days (per management approval).

  8. Hi. So I was the moderator who issued the ban.

     

    I banned due to the attached image. As you can see in the image, there was multiple messages sent in different channels with links for Discord Nitro (that is always assumed as a scam). 

     

    This was your first offense on discord. However, I am unable to confirm your claim of being hacked. I hope you can understand my point of view of it. My first thought upon seeing the messages, was surprise since usually it is random users that typically make these scams, and not players who actually do things on the server. I am inclined to believe your claim that it was a hack, especially being that you otherwise have no discord offenses.

     

    I don't believe I have the authority to unban users, however I would be comfortable with you being unbanned based off of this. 

    image0.png

  9. On 2/14/2019 at 5:58 PM, John Jeez Man said:

    D2BC4C54D9B200336267848A95DF2E5688E76EE4

    Back when Cypher was manager of purge and he was afk for hours. (not afk at all) We set up a photobooth to have a picture with cypher. 

    can i just mention the man the myth the legend Shiny Magikarp, as seen using his voice chat in the above pic. 

×
×
  • Create New...