Cassie
-
Posts
1,883 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
12 -
SteamID
76561198119644159
Content Type
Profiles
Articles
Updates
Projects
Twitch
Website Bugs/Suggestions
Guides
Newsletters
About GFL
Knowledge Base
Expenses/Hardware
Server Comparisons
Routing
Form Bugs
Community Representative Applications
Development Request
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Cassie
-
-
+1
-
6 hours ago, Mr Z said:
1. 939 Doesn't show up on the scoreboard, idk why people keep saying he does but i check and he doesn't
You are most likely using the wrong scoreboard; type br_usesb 1 in console to use the right one.
-
5 hours ago, Xy said:
Someone once suggested sacrificing a zombie for 100 - 200 health (for himself)
I can only imagine the rage the poor person would feel after first being turned into a zombie then sacrificed for health.
-
The armor should go away after a few minutes but otherwise +1
-
It doesn't make much sense if he can make his chat color D boi colored but shows up as a scientist on the scoreboard. I think he should just have has chat color the same as them.
-
+1
-
-
17 hours ago, Kite9867 said:
Fucking resign already smh. Jk cya around duc.
*Liked*
17 hours ago, TheSadBandit said:AYE DICK WHERES MY MENTION
Like I said, tagging is gay
-
12 hours ago, Smores said:
Isn't Breach a game where you're a class d and you have to escape the facility without dying? Why would Xy play that? He's manager of the GFL SCP Containment Breach server. He should be playing that.
I can't tell if you are joking or not.
-
Well it has been fun. Thanks to all the breach admins prior and current for being cool doodes, Including but not limited to @Xy@Kite9867@Gun_Slinger and a million others but tagging is gay and won't let me tag properly. Why am I leaving?
Because...In all actuality, this is a shitpost. But, it isn't.* The next month or so is fucking crazy for me. I am leaving this Friday for California. I will be back next Thursday I think. Ironically, I will be more active next week than this week since I will have my shitty laptop which can only run gmod. The week after that, the first week of July, I am going to my lake house which has no wifi ;-;. Hopefully not for the whole week though. The week after that, I am going to a summer camp where I can't bring electronics. The week after that, I am leaving for Canada. I will be able to get on the servers until we reach Canada. The week after that, we will be coming home from Canada. Finally, I will be done travelling, but my summer will have 2 weeks left. Yippee. The only thing that was my idea was the camp, although California won't be bad because we're going to Disneyland. Anyways, just thought I'd let you all know all this shit.
*Technically the title is correct, it is time I left. So its not a shitpost. I'm just not leaving for good. -
#gobacktowhentherewasnokeycardmodel
-
once in a blue moon or so
-
2399 would be used to target people that a person doesn't like so no to it. the rest are pretty good tho, although I can see people raging over 2818
-
Imma ban you for real /roll to pban kite
-
+1
-
34 minutes ago, Syntax said:
Yes it was. October-February. Check the events section, and the fact that we won many events just proves my point even further. Also, a lot of people never knew what GFL was until we connected with different communities.
It was successful because we had good players who won events?
-
Literally today we were having a conversation about having sex in the admin chat for a good 10 minutes.
-
-
3 minutes ago, TheSadBandit said:
In my honest opinion, if the question is whether to have the world's strongest military, and portray it as that or learning about our ecosystem and ways to better it, I choose both. The main increase for the military's budget is to give our soldiers who risk their lives for our freedom, a better pay, and a better living. I honestly think a soldier should live worry-free once they come to the US, they put their lives on the line to serve and protect us, and if that means increasing the military spending by 10% so they can have better benefits, then I am all for it. Here's 2018's budget and 2019's budget (hyperlink) the gov't spending our tax dollars on "bombing" black people in the Middle East.
As for EPA spending, if the govt would let a private sector do the cleaning, I bet they would not only finish much faster, but they would also do a way better job at cleaning all these polluting sites. They would also probably do it for less too, because one thing about working for the government you have to understand is that you can't be fired from working, and what I mean by this, is that you can't be laid off because your budget was cut. You can resign, but unless you don't do your minimum work, then there is no way you lose your job, and that is the reason these EPA scientists haven't moved forward much in 50 years, as long as they show "progress" toward something, such as slowly cleaning the Great Lakes, and stuff like that, they will take another 50 years to "finish" something that doesn't take that long.
I'll put a personal example of what I mean by this. Where I lived, there is a lake called Lake Managua, the dirtiest lake in all of Central America, it's the lake next to the capital city, and all the drainage systems would (and some still do) end up in the lake. The lake was so polluted people couldn't step within a 500 foot radius of the lake, because of all the toxins, and chemicals, and all the pollution. This was about 10 years ago, today the lake is cleaner, they're still working on finishing the cleaning process, but it's clean enough that a factory has set up a water purification plant, and they are bottling the purified water, and producing the most purified water, scientifically tested water. That is because of the private sector wanting to change the fact that the lake was black. It's just an example of what the private sector can do in 10 years, that the government couldn't do in 20.
Anyways, I'll read up on the 2 links you posted to get more informed about the issue, thanks for posting them!
tl;dr gov is shit. Wasn't there something in the constitution about overthrowing the gov if it become bad?
Anyways, I wish there were more companies like that who tried to fix problems rather than make money. Sure, they still make a profit, but its better than some company creating pollution to make money.
-
56 minutes ago, TheSadBandit said:
The hole in the ozone layer was caused by CFCs, but CFCs can also be produced from car emissions, which is why there are certain rules set in place for gas emissions for a car so that it's street legal, or legal at all.
Also I just debunked climate change, anyways, in the near 50 years the EPA had to research environmental fixes and stuff, what sort of stuff did they find out? I would love to know, because then I would know that my tax dollars are being used wisely, or at least for something useful, instead of trying to find what I believe is a mythical solution to "climate change".
Just basing it off the exponential changes in climate since the Ice Age, which the Earth has been getting hotter, that isn't being sped up by humans, it's a cycle, and the changes in weather show it. Scientists just don't want to admit that because then they lose funding (like they already lost it), because they haven't done any major accomplishments in ~50 years.
Well I would rather think my tax dollars are going towards trying to learn things and move forwards rather than going to bomb people.
Literally from the website of the EPA:
https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/climate-change-indicators-atmospheric-concentrations-greenhouse-gases#ref5
https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/greenhouse-gases -
4 minutes ago, TheSadBandit said:
Global warming has nothing to do with pollution (at least it's not scientifically proven), the fact is, in the 70s scientists were saying the Earth was going to freeze because of global cooling, then in the early 90s they changed their ideology to the Earth was warming up and the polar ice caps were melting, and the Earth would flood. Now the scientists changed their opinion just yet again to climate change, which is normal for Earth, as you can see in this image, Earth has been warming up since the Ice Age, it's just a normal process, and there really hasn't been a change in the climate that has caused deterioration of the Ozone layer either. The "hole" that scientists saw in 2012, that they said would end the world, not only shrinks and grows because of it's natural process, but it's remained unchanged (other than the fact that it grows and shrinks on it's own) since it was discovered. How many times have the scientists said the world is going to end? It's always wrong, the world isn't ending in 2012, it's not ending in 2022, or whenever the new date is. The fact that the scientists don't have a grasp of environmental problems such as "global warming" in all the years they've been funded (since 1970 when Nixon signed an executive order), it's been 48 years, and they're still unsure about the effects of global warming. That program doesn't need to be funded as it's just wasting money that could go elsewhere.
The change in climate had nothing to do with the hole in the ozone layer, that was caused by CFCs (chlorofluorocarbons) that were used in products until they were banned.
-
1 minute ago, TheSadBandit said:
We still use gasoline, yes, but every big factory that produced anything ran on coal. Factories in the 40s-50s were very popular too, as well as the wrongful disposal of toxins. They used to use the Great Lakes of the US as a dump zone, anything that was deemed toxic or garbage was thrown in rivers and lakes because they weren't thinking about the environment, they were thinking about money. Since then, the US (I can't speak for the rest of the world, because idk their laws) has created laws that protect the environment, and fine people a lot of money for wrongfully disposing of something. If a big company disposes of their wastes in a lake or something, they would get fined a hefty amount for it. That's why I said the Industrial Era (or Industrial Revolution, same thing), because it was the time when America polluted the most.
And trump wants to remove these laws because global warming is a Chinese hoax. (he wants to make more money/make rich people more money)
-
1 hour ago, TheSadBandit said:
Because in the Industrial Era everything ran on coal/fossil fuels, all the disposal went into the bodies of water (the Great Lakes of the US were health hazards), and ever, just read up more on it here if you're interested.
because the things we use now are so much better. Gasoline is a fossil fuel as well, so obviously we are still using those.
-
2 hours ago, TheSadBandit said:
I personally don't agree that the government should be spending as much money as it does "fixing" the environment, somewhere on this post I made a comment about Mt. Vesuvius and the impact it had on Pompeii, and the world. I'll just simply summarize it here, the volcano erupted and created more pollution that the entirety of the Industrial era (the most polluting era of the world), and that all went up into our atmosphere. That volcano erupted on Pompeii in 74AD, over 1900 years ago.
Why is the industrial era the most polluted? We are far beyond that, production wise, producing way more than we produced then.

*Liked*
939 Ability
in Denied
Posted
I mean its a different type of scoreboard. You still press tab to see it, it just looke different.
*lowkey triggered you didn't get want I meant*