Jump to content

juky

Server Manager
  • Content Count

    27
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

juky last won the day on August 13 2018

juky had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

96 Bronze 1

5 Followers

About juky

  • Birthday December 10

Recent Profile Visitors

1,705 profile views
  1. What I'm wondering is how a CSGO ZE player comes to look at himself as a chad relative to a CSS ZE player. No prestrafe (still, afaik), no bhop, janky ZM pushback dialed up to 11 rendering the zombies a passing thought. Your gamemode is trash and you should feel bad.
  2. 👋 

  3. The 2016 GFL money/server stealing situation. I regret a number of things, but two things specifically stick out. First one is consciously not divulging all information available to me in order to not infringe on my position of power through knowledge, which was motivated by a desire for vengeance, disregarding any morality on the way. Second one is how I processed and reflected on it all after the fact. I've been at my wits' end and back one too many times pursuing a range of different explanations with various intensities of cognitive dissonance for my lack of foresight/moral transgressions, for what ultimately wasn't too complicated of a set of motivations. Which was mostly caused by a mix of my perfectionism and ego preventing me from taking ownership of my mistakes, together with some strong emotions I had a hard time pinpointing until not too long ago. Probably too specific but there it is. In a way I'm grateful to have been forced to see myself for what I am/was. I just wish it wasn't as explosive and consequential.
  4. WoW classic baby all aboard 🚋🚋 🚋
  5. cute boy

  6. Antwerp, Belgium juky@DESKTOP-9M2VO72 ~ $ tracert 92.119.148.5 Tracing route to 92.119.148.5 over a maximum of 30 hops 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1 2 9 ms 13 ms 7 ms d54c09001.access.telenet.be [84.192.144.1] 3 10 ms 11 ms 8 ms dd5e0cc99.access.telenet.be [213.224.204.153] 4 9 ms 10 ms 9 ms dd5e0fa7b.access.telenet.be [213.224.250.123] 5 10 ms 8 ms 11 ms brx-b2-link.telia.net [80.239.132.217] 6 15 ms 17 ms 17 ms prs-bb3-link.telia.net [62.115.112.142] 7 16 ms 17 ms 17 ms prs-b7-link.telia.net [62.115.113.183] 8 * * * Request timed out. 9 * * * Request timed out. 10 * * * Request timed out. 11 * * * Request timed out. 12 * * * Request timed out. 13 * * * Request timed out. 14 * * * Request timed out. 15 * * * Request timed out. 16 * * * Request timed out. 17 * * * Request timed out. 18 * * * Request timed out. 19 * * * Request timed out. 20 * * * Request timed out. 21 * * * Request timed out. 22 * * * Request timed out. 23 * * * Request timed out. 24 * * * Request timed out. 25 * * * Request timed out. 26 * * * Request timed out. 27 * * * Request timed out. 28 * * * Request timed out. 29 * * * Request timed out. 30 * * * Request timed out. Trace complete.
  7. The Director Dilemma

    I wouldn't label this toxic, just pedantic, redundant, repetitive, etc. but more importantly, tiresome. This feels like another appeal to the lowest common denominator sense of frustration. As I understand the situation, GFL is struggling to find competent and motivated people to fill server manager slots. What makes you think there is any number of viable director candidates, let alone ones that haven't held the position before. This part screams naivety frankly. I don't see any major flaws in the working of the current directors, aside from apparently a continuous failure to manage expectations. please do something about the shitposts in this thread
  8. My go-to has to be Stella, but depends on the pub. I've always been a blonde type of guy, but after having lived in Vienna for a while and discovering their local beers (Ottakringer dark specifically), I've come to appreciate dark beers too.
  9. On the US server this is already in effect, though even there it could be tweaked slightly. Specifically: sv_accelerate 5 (currently 10) sv_friction 4 (currently 5.2) Comes a little closer to mimicking CS:S settings/feeling. The current attainable speed on prespeed is upwards of 320 with 260 base velocity, in CS:S this is 289.2~ afaik. sv_accelerate 10 also feels little gimmicky . You can drop your knife as it stands (again, only on US for now), but that's a good suggestion. fairly irrelevant gibberish for Roy in spoiler below
  10. About the video, do you acknowledge that the servers are being loaded in, while rapidly, by increments of 1? That's the issue with this sea of empty/reserved (face it types) servers. It isn't so much that people can't sort for by players after the results have come in, it is that the legitimate/desirable servers are delayed or blocked entirely from coming in at all. The rest of your post are off-topic generalities, so proceeding - Do you think it'd be worthwhile exercising a little more patience in hopes for their supposed scheduled community server browser overhaul to come through? As per https://twitter.com/basisspace/status/993683937862959105
  11. 84-12-15-2018-WhUqeQS3.png

     

    Server = success... till everyone's client crashed xd

  12. Add self-mute Sort out rtv (extended) settings: delay on rtv after mapchange to prevent a couple of people from forcing fast rtv exclude spectators in counting (possibly raise ratio to balance out) Sort out mapchooser (extended) settings: Add a timelimit (40-60 minutes baseline?) Add X extends of X minutes (5 extends of 20 minute baseline imo) Optionally make cfgs for the "24/7-tier" to increase number of extends Enable the feature that remove option 1-3 Look into possibly removing the "we will dance on your grave" sound clip for certain maps? It's a little obnoxious on the easiest of maps with high player count Look into removing "An enemy player was awarded with compensation for the suicide of <player> We can probably be fairly picky with which maps get to stay on the server given the our starting pool of maps was pretty big. People also seem to gravitate massively towards the same couple of maps in the "easy/beginner" sphere of servers, so quality > quantity seems the way to go, starting off at least.
  13. Thanks for clearing that up, I was under the impression there was some ulterior truth/narrative a group of people still adhered to as (I perceived to be) implied in the post by Fx I quoted. Nevermind me
  14. This notion should be worrying. Why would you shy away from retorting the things you perceive to be false, dishonestly represented or otherwise at all objectionable inside this thread (as opposed to behind closed doors)? It's in everyone's best interest for you to pinpoint and argue against the things you perceive as falsehoods. Seeing as @Violator isn't banned, and in your own words is still willing to elaborate on any questions asked, I'll take the liberty of asking them here. These might be redundant, but since there's this vague rejection of what's being communicated by higher ups as fabricated/corrupt/false it will have to be like this. 1. Do you acknowledge you removing directors roles from the GFL GMod discord after being demoted as factual? 1a. Do you acknowledge you putting forward as your reasoning behind demoting directors as factual? 2. Do you acknowledge plans of a group of TTT admins making their own server as factual? If yes, is this group (to the best of your knowledge) using the existing GFL TTT server files? If yes, how did they get access to these files? 3. Do you acknowledge having consistently referred to hierarchy as reasoning why directors should or should not work with managers directly (and should instead inquiry with division leaders) as per as factual? 4. Do you acknowledge manually removing my admin rank from the forums whilst holding the position of GMod division leader as factual (and in doing so rejected your own notion of hierarchy within GFL)? Please address the discrepancy in standards held between this question and the last. These are, again, pretty platonic and is of course not an exhaustive list of issues/possible falsehoods that could be addressed. This is an invitation for you (and others) to point out any actual (perceived) lies and falsehoods perpetrated. If you don't care to answer for your(/your "faction's") sake, answer for the broader community so that we may know who we're dealing with (referring to the people perpetrating falsehoods). Please don't look at these as me trying to set you up (if I did I would, for example, not have posted question 3 and 4 in the same post). It's a genuine quest to clear up a few misunderstandings (and hopefully some animosity). I only ask of you to be specific. @Xy_ please leave this thread open for a little while longer.
×
×
  • Create New...