Graverobber Change

[Izyb105 1 / 641]

Graverobber is decided on spawn instead of when the ankh is placed, this would help remove the frustration of becoming graverobber as a glutton or mesmerist.

[Mangost 49 / 1,185]

basically have it spawn at the start if there is a pharoah? yeah thats what i want, i feel like that would help a lot and make the game not as rage inducing. +1

[Unaverage Joe 38 / 2,812]

so add another useless role if the pharaoh never places his ankh or dies first?

I'm just still waiting for the patch that gives graverobbers only to default traitors, I know they have the code for it since it was used in a previous TTT2 version

[MutedMike 151 / 4,188]

2 hours ago, Unaverage Joe said:

so add another useless role if the pharaoh never places his ankh or dies first?

I'm just still waiting for the patch that gives graverobbers only to default traitors, I know they have the code for it since it was used in a previous TTT2 version

I think they meant like how lycan works, where the t doesn't know they're graverobber but is decided when the game starts.

[The1337Gh0st 238 / 8,594]

59 minutes ago, K1P_ said:

I think they meant like how lycan works, where the t doesn't know they're graverobber but is decided when the game starts.

 

What Izyb105 is suggesting is that if a Pharaoh were to spawn, then it would be guaranteed that one of the traitors that would spawn as a Graverobber instead of it currently replacing a random traitor's role with the Graverobber when the ankh is placed.

 

As for the suggestion itself, I believe that this change would be a work-around for how special Traitor roles can become a Graverobber. But as Unaverage Joe mentioned, this would make the Graverobber a potentially useless role if the Pharaoh never places an Ankh. If the bug regarding Graverobber was fixed though, then I believe it would be fine as it is right now.