August in the US: Muslim Appreciation Month.....

[CNe7532294 171 / 4,777]

I'm not even joking. Here is a link and if you still don't believe me GOOGLE IT. What the actual fuck? Clock boy part 2 much?

 

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-america/california-recognizes-august-muslim-appreciation-awareness-month-n621851

 

Inb4 o u racialist begut.

[Coolest Cat 1,266 / 14,449]

The bigotry in the comment section is too strong for me.

 

Maximum over autism. Save me plis.

 

On a more serious note: I understand why they did this. People can hate on the Muslim fundamentalist countries as much as they want since those countries do need serious reforms. But it's incredibly hypocritical for most people to hate on moderate Muslims in the United States. Sadly, I don't think that this will change anything for those dumb ass bigots who think all Muslims are terrorists. 

[CNe7532294 171 / 4,777]

True on the part where there is hatred and fear brewing of moderate and even secular people that came from the faith and regions where the faith was practiced.

 

Here's the problem. Ain't it hypocritical in itself to just give certain people special privileges over others? Even if its just for the times we live in? Why not let them speak for themselves. Example: I totally loved it when I saw the act of Muslims attending a French Catholic mass in solidarity over ISIS French priest killing. That is the type of thing I like to see. Them standing for themselves against a great evil that's trying to tie itself to Islam like a cancer. Things like just handing out an award to further an agenda however, I just view as a shallow kick jerk reaction that's self serving, condescending and frankly patronizing if I were of the faith.

[Little Ring 440 / 7,172]

Looks like I'll be eating pork all month now.

[Coolest Cat 1,266 / 14,449]

4 hours ago, Trapped said:

Looks like I'll be eating pork all month now.

 

Most people probably already do that.

 

mmm bacon.

[Little Ring 440 / 7,172]

Just now, Major_Push said:

 

Most people probably already do that.

 

mmm bacon.

 

 

Please tell me you get the joke.

[Coolest Cat 1,266 / 14,449]

1 hour ago, Trapped said:

 

 

Please tell me you get the joke.

I get it.

 

I'm making a joke as well. 

[TSARGA 57 / 3,122]

"Muslim Americans have made contributions to education, science, entertainment and medicine both nationally and globally,"

 

Just stop categorising economic actors by religion/race/sexuality.

[Roxie_Foxie 740 / 10,227]

Furries unite there is hope for us if Muslims can do it we can too

[Little Ring 440 / 7,172]

34 minutes ago, TSARGA said:

"Muslim Americans have made contributions to education, science, entertainment and medicine both nationally and globally,"

 

Just stop categorising economic actors by religion/race/sexuality.

 

Muslim Americans? I didn't know being Muslim has its own race too. 

[Coolest Cat 1,266 / 14,449]

1 hour ago, Trapped said:

 

Muslim Americans? I didn't know being Muslim has its own race too. 

Well, it makes sense though...

 

If I said Short Americans or Fat Americans then that doesn't imply that Short or Fat are races. It's just a description. 

[Little Ring 440 / 7,172]

7 minutes ago, Major_Push said:

Well, it makes sense though...

 

If I said Short Americans or Fat Americans then that doesn't imply that Short or Fat are races. It's just a description. 

 

I agree, but saying the religion then the country of origin doesn't sound right to me. In my mind saying Muslim Canadian or Christian American or Mormon Brazilian doesn't comprehend well.

[CheapTactic 74 / 3,855]

Islamist Arabs and Africans contributed almost nothing to the world in the last few hundred years other than violence, blood shed, religious conservatism and the mind thought of cave men with guns and trucks.

 

Islam is very tied with the terrorists that die for it, Islam has made a 180 degree turn when it was a religion that advocated for advancement, now its rapid conservatism and religious tribal warfare spread by their societies, the amount of the fundamentalist countries is not 1 or 2, its probably over 5 and even 10, if not the majority of countries that have a majority of Muslims in them.

 

Its time for the western powers to stop trying to fight their wars around the globe and cease all military support for most Islamic nations and armies around the globe and only act on defense on their homes, even if that means allowing countless genocides to commit between Muslims and other Muslims so be it, its their job and their turn to prove that they are able to change and that they are very well the "vast majority" of moderates, instead of bullshitting the masses that they are moderates from one side but supportive of religious conservatism and terrorism from the other side.

The west has nothing to look in their hellholes and has no reason to invade or fight there.

 

 

Also I take what I have believed back, Not only the African and Arab Muslims are scum and a stain to the Islamic faith, but also some Far Eastern countries.

I still hold that Iranian, Kurd and Slav(natural European) Muslims are normal by the majority.(even if quite a bit from the Islamic infestation came to infect the European minds and led them to go Syria to fight for terrorists which is no surprise when probably the majority if not vast majority of the Islamic doctrine that was taught to them was taught by Arabic Imams).

 

 

I wonder when the Atheist and Christian and Buddhist and Hindu and Pagan/Satanist appreciation months will come, or we will just give special days to random cults and groups in the country.

 

But I bet its only for the Muslims just in order to be more ass licking and dig deeper their heads in the sand while using the false statement that people that oppose to the status quo today of allowing barbarians in, dying in masses in terror attacks, ass licking and acting in panic, and going back to spanking themselves while ignoring the root problem, and let the cycle repeat, claim that all Muslims are terrorists.

 

 

Sad that shitty nations and people taint something that could be good and amazing...

Edited August 5, 2016 by CheapTactic

[TSARGA 57 / 3,122]

14 hours ago, Trapped said:

Muslim Americans? I didn't know being Muslim has its own race too. 

Islam is a religion. In this case, the Cadem dude categorises people by their religion. I mean, every economic actor has to make a contribution to the economy in exchange for financial benefit - but does an economic actor deserve more appreciation just because they're Muslim?

 

4 hours ago, CheapTactic said:

Islamist Arabs and Africans contributed almost nothing to the world in the last few hundred years other than violence, blood shed, religious conservatism and the mind thought of cave men with guns and trucks.

Because they got colonised and exploited with no return.

 

4 hours ago, CheapTactic said:

I wonder when the Atheist and Christian and Buddhist and Hindu and Pagan/Satanist appreciation months will come, or we will just give special days to random cults and groups in the country.

The Cadem is highly unpredictable.

[CheapTactic 74 / 3,855]

1 hour ago, TSARGA said:

Islam is a religion. In this case, the Cadem dude categorises people by their religion. I mean, every economic actor has to make a contribution to the economy in exchange for financial benefit - but does an economic actor deserve more appreciation just because they're Muslim?

 

Because they got colonised and exploited with no return.

 

The Cadem is highly unpredictable.

1st.

No, they should be attributed for their nationality and not religion, but for that I guess you understand I have not meant.

Almost every religion can co exist in a country until they start to oppose the state.

 

2nd.

With no return?Technological advances were the return and the "exploitation" in the middle east barely happened other than some powers taking over but not the same as in Africa.

Which still isn't justified in any way, since they had support and aid from European countries and enough time to build up their countries if they wanted instead of running to leech from normal countries or barely doing anything.

And no I don't expect them to be like Israel or Germany in a few decades, but fact is?Some countries in Africa have worked and have improved since their liberty.

And in addition countries for example like Saudi Arabia, Iran and etc.... that maybe other than some crappy missiles that counter their western counterparts haven't produced almost anything that benefits the entire world, even if they have money that reaches the skies.

 

3rd.Probably won't happen at all...Just look..I put 200000$ on it.

Edited August 5, 2016 by CheapTactic

[Little Ring 440 / 7,172]

9 minutes ago, TSARGA said:

Islam is a religion. In this case, the Cadem dude categorizes people by their religion. I mean, every economic actor has to make a contribution to the economy in exchange for financial benefit - but does an economic actor deserve more appreciation just because they're Muslim?

 

Of course not, being Muslim doesn't give you more appreciation. Everyone deserves to be treated equally.

[TSARGA 57 / 3,122]

5 hours ago, CheapTactic said:

With no return?Technological advances were the return and the "exploitation" in the middle east barely happened other than some powers taking over but not the same as in Africa.

Most of those technological advances were imposed by colonists against the will of the locals. You know, forced economic exchanges - typical left-wing bullshit forcing people and saying it's for their own good.

 

6 hours ago, CheapTactic said:

Which still isn't justified in any way, since they had support and aid from European countries and enough time to build up their countries

They built artificial States with political borders.

 

 

6 hours ago, CheapTactic said:

instead of running to leech from normal countries or barely doing anything.

What do you mean?

[CheapTactic 74 / 3,855]

9 hours ago, TSARGA said:

Most of those technological advances were imposed by colonists against the will of the locals. You know, forced economic exchanges - typical left-wing bullshit forcing people and saying it's for their own good.

 

They built artificial States with political borders.

 

 

What do you mean?

Don't shove me into the bullshit left-right nonsense.

These technological advances helped them live more than shitty 30 years and improved their infrastructure, I never spoke about how it was given to them nor in what way, and funny enough those "forced" technologies for some reason seemed to work better in the middle east than in Africa.

 

If already we are going to this way, the French and Brit type of colonial conquests were different and it was the French that have 'felt' like spreading their culture to everywhere they go(mostly like in North Africa) by teaching French and by teaching the locals farming and etc....

Forced or not, these things could have been used later when liberty was gained as somewhat of a basis for a country.

 

 

What do I mean?I mean the millions that run around the world to seek a country to leech from, like dozens of thousands that reached Israel and ruined parts of cities in it, now they leech from it and there were even videos of them blessing Hitler and not giving a crap about Israel on itself.

 

The corrupt leaders they choose and the change they aren't doing in their nations and by that leaving them to be poor barely advanced hellholes, and to be a normal country you don't have to be a western country and its a fact that some African countries are trying to make a change and showed an improvement over the years.  

 

I don't care about any "artificial state" points, they still had enough support and aid, nevertheless did their countries go wrong like in the middle east.

 

Edited August 6, 2016 by CheapTactic

[TSARGA 57 / 3,122]

3 hours ago, CheapTactic said:

Don't shove me into the bullshit left-right nonsense.

I meant that this type of forced economic exchanges is what our left-wing politicians want/propose/do and what happened in the colonies is the same thing, just in another format.

 

3 hours ago, CheapTactic said:

Forced or not, these things could have been used later when liberty was gained as somewhat of a basis for a country.

Of course, but "used" as in "Eastern countries used highways built during occupation by the Third Reich".

 

3 hours ago, CheapTactic said:

I don't care about any "artificial state" points, they still had enough support and aid, nevertheless did their countries go wrong like in the middle east.

The law of spontaneous order also applies to ethnic groups. Natural borders exist because obstacles such as mountains, rivers or canyons prevent populations from interacting/mixing. Artificial States with political borders lead to nothing else but separatism.

 

ISIS is also driven by the ideology of eliminating artificial States and political borders made by colonialists.

[CheapTactic 74 / 3,855]

5 hours ago, TSARGA said:

I meant that this type of forced economic exchanges is what our left-wing politicians want/propose/do and what happened in the colonies is the same thing, just in another format.

 

Of course, but "used" as in "Eastern countries used highways built during occupation by the Third Reich".

 

The law of spontaneous order also applies to ethnic groups. Natural borders exist because obstacles such as mountains, rivers or canyons prevent populations from interacting/mixing. Artificial States with political borders lead to nothing else but separatism.

 

ISIS is also driven by the ideology of eliminating artificial States and political borders made by colonialists.

Uh, I would see that as something Imperialistic and in another format what do you mean?When it was in the imperialistic concept it was more by force than what I would guess you mean.

 

Yeah, actually where's my mistake?Highways that would have been built by the 3rd Reich would have been used later on, and I doubt it was the same as the 3rd Reich conditions, if it would be like that, there would be barely any African nations left in our world, which of course, didn't happen.

 

What was brought could have been used as a basis, you just gave another example(even though, Eastern countries were somewhat still developed).

 

 

Oh, I know what ISIS tries to do and I get what you mean, but would you agree that most of these tribal wars are mostly in the middle east?

And colonists eh?Like what kind?I know that the Brits and the French ruled this area and have split it and today it shows the signs of cracking.

It seems like the area should calm down first, a few groups that want a new Islamic K'halifa doesn't mean that their borders have failed.

 

Most of the conflicts I take notice in the middle east steam from Religious/political reasons, not necessarily tribe vs tribe of different people. 

 

You owe me 10$.

 

Edited August 6, 2016 by CheapTactic