How the forum order should be.

[rapperdan 2,323 / 0]

 

jk open spoiler to see how it really should be 

[Joshy 4,364 / 44,945]

Why should the order change?  I don't understand it or maybe I missed a joke?

[rapperdan 2,323 / 0]

5 minutes ago, Joshy said:

Why should the order change?  I don't understand it or maybe I missed a joke?

look in the spoiler devs I'm pretty sure should be above managers if not admins.

More so a chain of command.

[Joshy 4,364 / 44,945]

2 minutes ago, rapperdan said:

look in the spoiler devs I'm pretty sure should be above managers if not admins.

More so a chain of command.

 

I saw the spoiler and the changes you made, but why should it change?  Is your answer to match the chain of command?  I wasn't aware of Developers having higher "authority" than Server Managers neither Creative Team over VIP.  Is this something new, and why would it even matter?

[QiadoxSkel 86 / 3,049]

-1 CA not below member

 

chill guys this was a joke

Edited July 29, 2017 by QiadoxSkel

[rapperdan 2,323 / 0]

Just now, Joshy said:

 

I saw the spoiler and the changes you made, but why should it change?  Is your answer to match the chain of command?  I wasn't aware of Developers having higher "authority" than Server Managers neither Creative Team over VIP.  Is this something new, and why would it even matter?

The creative team and VIP was a joke anyways devs should be higher then managers if not managers put them higher then admins.

[Joshy 4,364 / 44,945]

5 minutes ago, rapperdan said:

The creative team and VIP was a joke anyways devs should be higher then managers if not managers put them higher then admins.

 

They really should scrap the developer position.  There aren't any, they aren't recruiting, and they declined when I offered to revive the team while I was a community advisor.  It seems they only want to save that position for a trusted group, and if they're trusted, then they'll be sent to the technical administrator position anyways.  Developer is redundant and server managers often have to be their own developer or the server admins within their team.

 

While I was a developer (old forums) we did not have higher authority than server admins.  We just had technical talent.  In my current field: Technical talent has massive value and it often shields us from authority and administrative processes; however: It also does not give us authority.  I cannot go around and tell someone what to do unless it's related to safety.

 

I think this is a useless change and it only reinforces an appeal to authority fallacy.  It's just further decoration.

Edited July 28, 2017 by Joshy

[rapperdan 2,323 / 0]

2 minutes ago, Joshy said:

 

They really should scrap the developer position.  There aren't any, they aren't recruiting, and they declined when I offered to revive the team while I was a community advisor.  It seems they only want to save that position for a trusted group, and if they're trusted, then they'll be sent to the technical administrator position anyways.  Developer is redundant and server managers often have to be their own developer or the server admins within their team.

 

While I was a developer (old forums) we did not have higher authority than server admins.  We just had technical talent.  In my current field: Technical talent has massive value and it often shields us from authority and administrative processes; however: It also does not give us authority.  I cannot go around and tell someone what to do unless it's related to safety.

 

I think this is a useless change and it only reinforces an appeal to authority fallacy.  It's just further decoration.

You just gave me a great suggestion.

 

[rapperdan 2,323 / 0]

ty @Joshy 

 

[QiadoxSkel 86 / 3,049]

When I looked at what position best suited me for fixing up TTT I looked at developer and saw no practical reason to take up the position. There was no tangible benefit over just being a  member that tests their plugins with a manager. Put this on top of the position seemingly being harder to get than manager it's easy to see why no one holds it.

[Shuruia 3,145 / 28,033]

The order is fine as it is. You don't have to look at it from a "chain of command" perspective, since the ranks are grouped together based on which category they fall under.

 

 

Red = Higher echelons

Cyan = Server operation

Pink = Auxiliary teams

White = Player tiers

 

The only rank that I think would overlap two categories is technical administrator, which I suppose you could argue should also fall under the red category. You could also say that division leaders should fall under the blue category, but their role in the community isn't supposed to be inherently limited to mere server operation.

Edited July 28, 2017 by Shuruia

[Ben 2,378 / 31,861]

1 hour ago, Shuruia said:

The order is fine as it is. You don't have to look at it from a "chain of command" perspective, since the ranks are grouped together based on which category they fall under.

 

 

Red = Higher echelons

Cyan = Server operation

Pink = Auxiliary teams

White = Player tiers

 

The only rank that I think would overlap two categories is technical administrator, which I suppose you could argue should also fall under the red category. You could also say that division leaders should fall under the blue category, but their role in the community isn't supposed to be inherently limited to mere server operation.

From what I thought and believe:

White: Staff

Blue: People who aren't staff, but help and volunteer their time taking care of GFL's server

Yellow: Teams

Gray: Member and players.

 

Anything above TA is technically staff since Managers doesn't have badges, but they are just higher-ups(which it keeps messing my mind). 

 

Pardon me for using cancerous line thick. I'm confused when I use ShareX.

[Chormee 2,973 / 29,227]

4 hours ago, Shuruia said:

The order is fine as it is. You don't have to look at it from a "chain of command" perspective, since the ranks are grouped together based on which category they fall under.

 

 

Red = Higher echelons

Cyan = Server operation

Pink = Auxiliary teams

White = Player tiers

 

The only rank that I think would overlap two categories is technical administrator, which I suppose you could argue should also fall under the red category. You could also say that division leaders should fall under the blue category, but their role in the community isn't supposed to be inherently limited to mere server operation.

So why is Community advisor not in player tiers, i mean they act like it xD

[rapperdan 2,323 / 0]

14 minutes ago, lmao said:

So why is Community advisor not in player tiers, i mean they act like it xD

You're welcome I removed the CA group then added it to the end of the groups fucking @QiadoxSkel asked me to do this before and it took me less then 5 minutes yet was cancer you guys are welcome.  inspect element is fun.

Edited July 29, 2017 by rapperdan

[Chormee 2,973 / 29,227]

17 minutes ago, rapperdan said:

You're welcome I removed the CA group then added it to the end of the groups fucking @QiadoxSkel asked me to do this before and it took me less then 5 minutes yet was cancer you guys are welcome.  inspect element is fun.

This is why dan should be director instead of roy like #fuckroy

[-_Fx_- 666 / 11,186]

I think this is more accurate

 

[rapperdan 2,323 / 0]

14 minutes ago, Fx280 said:

I think this is more accurate

 

Did you really just take the time and effort to photo shop something on the end instead of just using inspect element?

[John Jeez Man 556 / 12,201]

mhm

 

[-_Fx_- 666 / 11,186]

1 minute ago, rapperdan said:

Did you really just take the time and effort to photo shop something on the end instead of just using inspect element?

no i used paint

[rapperdan 2,323 / 0]

12 minutes ago, Fx280 said:

no i used paint

How to use inspect element in under 1 minute for the same results. 

Please ignore my book marks they may be abit old.

Edited July 29, 2017 by rapperdan